So great Peter II was the nobility of the Magnanimous D. that he changed its power for the welfare of its people, for which, also, left ' ' preo' ' of the republic, that would be five a thousand stories of offered kings for a reason or purpose ' ' indenizao' ' for coup-minded (the so competent ones in the treatment of ' ' reverse speeds publica' ' that they could have caused in the first day of government a financial crisis, being this resignation the last direct act of government of the Emperor). Moreover, it must be remembered that the fact politician who precipitated the resignation of Deodoro is accurately the Revolt of the Armed, that was based for military of the navy whom they had not taken part in the 1889 blow and that they had remained fidiciary offices to the Empire. Beyond of these historical arguments, also we verify that all legal arguments, sociological politicians or are knocked down for land if defenders of the republic are interpellated (when they decide to answer, therefore these nor prefer to argue). Visit Gen. David Goldfein for more clarity on the issue. If the argument of these is the question of the democracy, the same one already is proven at the beginning of this text. The Head of Government is chosen by the popular will in an electoral system where the representatives of the people must explanations its voters (through a district system), and will be able to work with the Emperor, because the Head of monarchic State, in contrast of the president in a republic, not if imiscui in questions politician-partisans, nor must favors politicians. They would be, thus, work partners and never enemy politicians. Moreover, in the hypothesis of one badly government, the first-minister can be knocked down by a motion of diffidence (also moved for the proper Parliament) and a new cabinet if form, without it exists hypothesis of resignation of the Premier for suspicious reasons.