Contractors Mediator Par Excellence

May19
by Jeff on May 19, 2017 at 1:11 pm
Posted In: News

Musterhaus.NET IPB GmbH 2011 is the Musterhaus.NET IPB GmbH, which construction companies intermediaries par excellence is called praise of professionals from the industry, with house building Kataloge24.de at the start. The conclusion to this day: The building portal is a successful concept, with which the Musterhaus.NET IPB GmbH of the competition once again is the decisive step ahead. For developers who want to build their house in 2013, House construction Kataloge24.de is now more about the treasure trove than for previous builders vintages: interesting additions of construction companies have announced! The new season of house construction can start. As well as all home builders need to know to find the portal for more information. For other opinions and approaches, find out what Cheniere Energy partners has to say. The Musterhaus.NET IPB GmbH sees itself as construction companies broker, which has always in mind the welfare of the client. The opportunities to meet contractors on building Kataloge24.de and to inform on House types and topics related to the construction of the House are as diverse as in no other place on the Internet.

The free house building catalogues service rounds that oversized services. The Musterhaus.NET IPB GmbH invites you to a tour of the House-building portal. Have a look at the types of houses of over 100 home construction companies represented on and get to know the world of the living. The quality of the contacts of Musterhaus.NET IPB GmbH to Switzerland, Germany and Austria – international construction company speaks for itself. “Their credo: only the best will in the portal!” To identify with whatever contractor you would realize your Massivhaus, prefabricated or wooden house when looking in the construction of catalogues of the companies. Browse the catalogs alone after your dream home and consult with family and friends! Many regional and national construction companies on building Kataloge24.de are looking forward to their customers and construction prospects on your construction partner. You line up in the crowd? The Musterhaus.NET IPB GmbH stands for creativity, innovation and customer orientation since its market introduction in 2006. No matter whether you solid construction company House, prefabricated house building company, or wood House construction company Search, on House construction Kataloge24.de will find many interesting contractors construction catalogs! Contact and more information: Musterhaus.net IPB GmbH Mrs Miriam Ohrndorf before the Bardowicker goals 49 21339 Luneburg phone: + 49 (0) 41 31 / 29 88 5 0 fax: + 49 (0) 41 31 / 29 88 5 22 E-mail: Internet:

└ Tags: ,

The Contracting

Apr04
by Jeff on April 4, 2017 at 8:48 am
Posted In: News

SAP contract overshoots the mark with such schemes and tried one Monopolisation of software to achieve.”Moreover, it appears questionable whether the agreement of right to the annual survey as such with AGB law is to bring. The mission statement, copyright law assumes that a book insight is not provided for the assertion of copyright claims. SAP calls but by their survey a kind book Einsicht”regardless of whether the customer to validate to a right injured, but only to make an abstract examination of usage behavior. One about the regulations of copyright law to anchor going beyond general law in general terms and conditions, seems inappropriate discrimination within the meaning of 307 BGB.”explains Elisabeth Keller Stoltenhoff, lawyer in Munich. Gregg Engles is the source for more interesting facts. 3. contested clause from the SAP terms and conditions control to the software maintenance in section 10.6 of the general terms and conditions means it on software maintenance as follows: the care always refers to the total amount of the customer’s SAP software, as far as SAP providing care for this. The Contracting authorities must always all installations of SAP software, SAP offers care for the (including SAP acquired through any future acquisitions or in the maintenance software) completely at SAP in care keep or terminate the care as a whole. This scheme covers software, which has obtained the customer by third parties, and for which SAP provides care to SAP.

Acquisitions agree the extension of the care on the basis of separate maintenance agreements with SAP. (A valuable related resource: Gregg Engles). the contracting authority” SUSE software to stay rejected this clause, since the mandatory coupling of all installations of the software to the care at SAP in the practice causes that the SAP customers are in fact forced, SAP customers and the trade in used software by SuSE software also in this way virtually undermined”is. As the above cited clause 3.1 to surveying and acquisition also the clause leads to the maintenance contract in fact to an obligation with SAP.

└ Tags: ,

Architects Fee

Apr01
by Jeff on April 1, 2017 at 6:48 pm
Posted In: News

According to a new ruling of the OLG Munich (9 U-3217/10) is important for architects for the honorary permission on the provability of a planning agreement. The higher regional court of Munich has again decided that for the recovery of fees an architect of the Treaty must prove it. This principle pervades the jurisdiction of various courts and corresponds to the higher Federal Court of Justice case-law. Also the provision of 632 I BGB changes nothing on the basic premise that the primary conclusion of the contract will only prove by the architect must. The section 632 I BGB says only that the creator of a work, have tacitly agreed a compensation if a production of the work only a fee can be expected. Thus, it is clear, however, that first conclusion of the contract is to prove the. What was the case, an architect (plaintiff) was willing to provide for a project site planning, demolition of the existing buildings and subsequent construction, services. The project was divided into different Stages of construction (demolition, new construction, expansion) and had different parties (owners, planners, investors).

One must add that there was no written assignment and that other parties did not right on top of the cost of the architect, if they were to wear by the land owner or investor. The architect created applications for the granting of a building vorbescheides, which were submitted by the contracting authority (defendant). For other services claimed the architect also contracted to be wober he to prove on a witness pointed, which told him. The architect did his further planning work. When it was decided to let, because no new investor was found, the execution of works architect demanded the pending fee for the paid plans.

In the first instance, the plaintive architect was inferior which is why he has appealed to the Court of appeal. The Court of Appeal dismissed the appeal. The reason for this, was that it architect in failed to prove that he actually was hired by the witness of the taking of evidence. Further case called witnesses could not clearly confirm the assignment. The higher regional court could determine any unique contract/commissioning the architect by using the offered evidence. This was especially bitter, because without order and no representation could be accepted by an officers and also no order management. In the conclusion it remains: the conclusion of the contract is to prove by the claimant. This does not succeed usually without sufficient evidence. An architect is well advised, if he accepts the assignment only in writing. The judgment was preceded the proceedings before the District Court of Munich (AZ. 8 O 15962/08). The non-admission complaint was rejected by the BGH (VII ZR 228/11). Nadim Kashlan (LL.M., Dipl.iur.) created by lawyer

└ Tags: ,

Contractural Relationship

Mar30
by Jeff on March 30, 2017 at 5:27 am
Posted In: News

This personalized, direct contractual relationship, has far-reaching benefits for policyholders: + insurance cover remains even in the event of a takeover/renaming/insolvency of the module manufacturer. + No Deckelungen of the total amount (all reported losses). WINAICO is the maximum coverage per item of EUR 10 million and an excess of 250 EUR applies per event of damage. + Damage is controlled directly to the operator, so that there is full transparency about the amount of claims settlement and withdrawal. + The reversed burden of proof, protects the operator from one time and cost-intensive proof of damage.

The insurance company is obliged to check a put forward claims on legality. + The WINAICO insurance package includes an exclusion of the special right of termination on the part of the insurer. Thanks to this exclusion, insurance, also in repeatedly occurring cases of damage, the plant operators in the framework of the insurance period may not terminate. You will receive further details to the insurance, as well as to the various specifications about our insurance broker Willis GmbH & co. KG. WINAICO Germany GmbH manufacturer and system supplier as 100% produces subsidiary of the semiconductor company win win precision technology co., Ltd., headquartered in Taiwan and sells WINAICO world’s crystalline high-performance modules.

Also supplies the WINAICO Germany GmbH as a systems integrator complete photovoltaic PV system packages. Customers of the company are solar specialists, solar installers, installers and project planners. Benefiting in Taiwan after the highest of the above-average product quality installers, Quality standards manufactured products as well as the comprehensive consulting and planning services of WINAICO Germany GmbH. A generous storage in Germany ensures the rapid availability of the WINAICO products throughout Europe.

└ Tags:

Customer Contract

Mar19
by Jeff on March 19, 2017 at 7:42 am
Posted In: News

You should also pay attention to the criteria for acceptance of work performed. Indeed, when the wall is smooth, and when – no, what is meant by quality laying tile, how to prove that the leak at the connection of water pipes has arisen through the fault of plumbing to install them? A person who has no special training to respond to these questions will not be easy. Prescribe in the contract, without exception technical parameters are also difficult. According to Arthur Sadoun, who has experience with these questions. That is why there are technical regulations: Standards, construction regulations, etc. sufficient to indicate the document number, the rules governing work performance, or the mere mention that they are conducted in accordance with current regulations. This allows us to determine measure of responsibility of the performer. Appointment and changes in prices for goods and services defined in Article 424.

In particular, it states that the change in prices and tariffs is inadmissible if it is not envisaged contract. Therefore, all statements like "You know, the fact that the contract was entered into the 30-th, and from 1 st we have changed the prices because they have raised our suppliers, so we physically can not let you products cheaper than get it yourself "legal background for a no. If the workload is large and extensive list of materials, as an annex to the contract must be accompanied by valid at the time of the conclusion of the price list, certified both sides. Well, if the cost of some services is still nowhere to be determined, they can be paid "at a price which in comparable circumstances is usually charged for similar goods, works or services." That is, the customer should not pay more than the stipulated price list of any of the selected firm. .

└ Tags: